Concerns have been raised about whether Shirley Agrupis, the chair of the Commission on Higher Education (CHED), has become the most travelled chairperson in the organization's history and what advantages her travels have brought to Philippine higher education.
Agrupis' increasing attendance at international events has drawn the attention of critics and observers in the education sector, who are now calling for greater transparency about the number, cost, and outcomes of her international travels.
Her latest trip to Paris has brought the issue back into focus.
In a social media post, Agrupis described the extreme heat in the French capital, saying temperatures had reached 43 degrees Celsius and were “too hard to tolerate/survive.”
She also made broad observations about Paris' preparedness for climate change, claiming the “world's famous City apparently is not ready or have not anticipated that climate change was coming.”
Agrupis went on to say that because homes, apartments, some hotels, and public areas lacked air conditioning, there was "practically NO place to hang on" in the heat.
While attending an international engagement, a senior Philippine government official publicly discussed conditions in a host country in a tone that provoked criticism.
Agrupis ended her post with a call to action on climate change: “LET US save our planet EARTH.”
The post drew reactions online, including one social media user who remarked: “Let's save our planet earth tapos nag travel sa Paris. Hahaha.”
Beyond the social media exchange, however, questions over Agrupis' foreign travel remain.
Some have questioned whether her overseas schedule is more extensive than that of previous CHED chairpersons. Examining and disclosing CHED's official travel records would reveal the number of trips Agrupis has taken, their funding sources, and the measurable outcomes of each engagement.
The head of CHED frequently travels overseas, particularly as Philippine universities participate in regional and global education initiatives and expand their international partnerships.
On the other hand, observers argue that the frequency of these interactions should be accompanied by clear and noticeable benefits for the country's higher education system.
How many international trips has Agrupis taken since taking office? What particular initiatives, partnerships, or chances for Filipino institutions and students have resulted from these interactions, and how much money has been invested in them?
At a time when CHED is still addressing pressing domestic issues, the growing attention to Agrupis' foreign travel is unlikely to end without greater transparency.
Whether Agrupis is, in fact, CHED's most traveled chairperson will be determined by the records. The more important question is what Philippine higher education has learned from the journey.








.jpeg)